<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - wellwritten paper</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for wellwritten paper</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Good paper journal club -- 17 April 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Many scientific research papers tend to be jargon-ridden, written for a specialist audience, and generally a struggle to read. But how can busy scientists find, and hence learn from, well-written papers? Earmarking clearly written manuscripts as one comes across them]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Writing a clear and engaging paper</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Some time ago, my colleague Leslie Sage wrote an article called "writing a clear and engaging paper" to advise scientists (astronomers, actually, but the article translates to any discipline) wishing to submit to _Nature_. Leslie and the publisher, Springer, have]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
