<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - web20</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for web20</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Nature's big data special, free for 2 weeks</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - There is a “Big Data” special in this week’s (4 Sept 2008) issue of "_Nature_":http://www.nature.com/nature. The articles in the package look at how massive influxes of data are changing the way science is done in many fields, and include a]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vote for "Method of the Year"</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Noah Gray - Last year, the editors of _Nature Methods_ chose a "Method of the Year" (MOY) and the winner was "next generation sequencing":http://www.nature.com/nmeth/focus/moy2007/index.html. This feature included an editorial, commentaries, news features and other types of content discussing the winning technique. This year,]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scientific Researchers and Web 2.0: Social NotWorking?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sarah Kemmitt - The topic for this event is ‘Scientific Researchers and Web 2.0: Social NotWorking?’ and we plan for this to be a quarterly café scientifique format event exploring varied topical issues in science. Timo Hannay, the Publishing Director of Nature.com, will]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Web 2.0 in the enterprise</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Timo Hannay - Gavin Bell from NPG Web Publishing forwarded a link to "this interesting article":http://www.director.co.uk/MAGAZINE/2008/8%20August/enterprise2.0_62_1.html about 'enterprise 2.0' in _Director_ magazine (from the IOD). It even includes rash talk of the end of hierarchical organisations. _Gulp!_ ;) McKinsey have also "published":http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Building_the_Web_20_Enterprise_McKinsey_Global_Survey_2174 some]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scott L</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Scott L - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Web 2.0 in neuroscience</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Timo Hannay - This isn't new but might be of interest to people in the group. The ever excellent "Noah Gray":http://network.nature.com/profile/noah from _Nature Neuroscience_ has "written":http://blogs.nature.com/nn/actionpotential/2008/03/ng_neuroscience_and_web.html on their blog, Action Potential, about Web 2.0 in his domain. Together with the comments it stimulated,]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Infiltration of web 2.0 content with stealth advertising?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sarah Kemmitt - Do you trust Web2.0 content when people are giving advice or opinions on products or services? It's an ideal forum for "shills":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill to operate in, and must be very difficult to detect. So, for example, in an on-line support group]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scientific Researchers and Web 2.0: Social Not Working?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sarah Kemmitt - So you use Nature Networks, but what do you really think of the impact of Web2.0 on research? Below we pose a few questions to get the discussion going. * _Social Not Working?_ Web 2.0 gives many opportunities for user]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feddback about Web 2.0 in pharma and biotech</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Timo Hannay - After I asked him about Web 2.0 examples in pharma, Tim O'Reilly "Twittered":http://twitter.com/timoreilly/statuses/831541735 it. "Attila":http://network.nature.com/profile/UC5066B60 then wrote to point me to "this Nature Biotech editorial":http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0408-358 about the (supposedly) first biotech company blog. (Things have reached a sorry state when I]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science and Web 2.0</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ian Mulvany - At the same conference (OR08) there was a great talk by Simon Coles on the subject of pushing the archiving of data further down the food chain into the laboratory. He presented work on a project called B4L (Blogs for]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
