<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - survey</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for survey</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Bioinformatics career survey, to end of July</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Via "Indigenus blog":http://blogs.nature.com/indigenus/2008/07/bioinformatics_survey.html: Some science bloggers working on computational biology are trying to get a general picture of the field through a survey "Creating a picture of different careers in bioinformatics":http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2008/07/creating-a-picture-of-different-careers-in-bioinformatics/. It is anonymous and all information will be made]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misconduct survey stirs the pot -- 3 July 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - An Editorial and Commentary in the 19 June issue of Nature (_Nature_ *453*, 957; 2008 and _Nature_ *453*, 980–982; 2008) are hotly debated at "Nature Network's News and Opinion forum":http://tinyurl.com/5onqpl. In the Commentary, Sandra Titus, director of intramural research at]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Signaling Gateway Survey: what do you think?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - The "Signaling Gateway":http://www.signaling-gateway.org/ team invites you to complete a brief online survey on the usability of the site for the chance to win a FREE iPod Touch or two-year subscription to _Nature_. Your feedback will help ensure that we continue]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Repairing Research Integrity</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brendan Maher - Update (4 August): Nature just published a "handful of letters":http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v454/n7204/index.html#cr in response to the commentary from Sandra Titus James Wells and Lawrence Rhoades. Sandra Titus, James Wells and Lawrence Rhoades provide a stirring indictment of the research community in a]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Students told to exagerrate university's merits on official survey</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matt Brown - Kingston University is in trouble, after a member of staff asked students to "inflate the institution's worthiness":http://live.cgcu.net/news/1754#discussion in the "National Student Survey":http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/. Results from the survey influence a number of league tables used by prospective students, employers and funders. The]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Second Nature events: the survey</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Joanna Scott - During this short break from events, we thought it would be a good idea to have "a survey":http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=b7AGYgwIev8G3Cfi_2b_2fQJ7w_3d_3d, to try and assess how we're getting on so far, what worked, what didn't, what we should do in the future, that]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jeremy Taylor</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Jeremy Taylor - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brands in SL</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Iwona Gruszka - Hi! I need Your help. I'm going to defend master thesis about promotion and adverts in SL. This link takes you to the survey (in English) about brands in Second Life. Please, if you have 3 minutes... Fill it up]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The problem with science communication is, well, the science</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Barbara Axt - Matt Brown posted a "blog entry":http://network.nature.com/london/news/blog/matt/2008/03/05/whos-got-an-opinion-on-public-engagement-with-science with a "questionnaire":https://nesta.wufoo.com/forms/science-and-the-world/ about science engagement. I filled it and included some comments, that I'm pasting here. Written in two minutes it's roughly, very roughly, a bit of what I think about it: "_In]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who's got an opinion on public engagement with science?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matt Brown - As part of the BA’s "National Science and Engineering Week":http://www.the-ba.net/the-ba/Events/NSEW/ (more of which soon), "NESTA":http://www.nesta.org.uk/ is gathering opinions on that perennial question: how to improve public engagement with science. They’ve put together a "short questionnaire":https://nesta.wufoo.com/forms/science-and-the-world/ where you can air your]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
