<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - scientific literacy</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for scientific literacy</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>OMG, GMO!</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Eva Amsen - I just wrote the second part of "What happens on the internet does not stay on the internet":http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/U27CE62BB/2008/03/31/what-happens-on-the-internet-does-not-stay-on-the-internet-part-1 and will put that up in a moment. I was reminded of it tonight after I just _had_ to leave a comment]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mr Grumpy is back in town</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Richard Grant - "Apparently":http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/laser-snipers-hit-planes/2008/03/29/1206207485440.html bq. "These laser beams are now so powerful they can shine up to five kilometres." Well, no, actually. They are "so powerful" that they can shine for infinity. As can the least powerful laser, if there's nothing in the]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Times They Are A-Changin'</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Richard Grant - I have been "whining":http://blogs.usyd.edu.au/labrats/2007/03/wrong_again.html about "Wikipedia":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page , the free encyclopedia where you can write any old rubbish. The major problem I have with the project is its assumed authority. It is treated as a reliable source by, I guess, most]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
