<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - science journalism</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for science journalism</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Claudio Pasqua</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Claudio Pasqua - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do you write more for friends, colleagues or for the general audience?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hank Campbell - In my various (albeit admittedly limited) internet wanderings among the science blogosphere I see a cross-section of writers with a variety of approaches and audience sizes. There are large sites like ours or Nature or LiveScience or Scienceblogs and then]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jane Douglas</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Jane Douglas - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should science writers specialize?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Igor Zolnerkevic - Hello, Some science writers or journalists specialize in covering a certain branch of knowledge. For instance, Carl Zimmer covers Life Sciences while Philip Ball covers Physical Sciences. These science writers, however, still cover a large chunk of research. Others specialize]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Writing about science rather than doing it</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Corie Lok - Ari Shapiro thought he was going to become a scientist. Currently, he is writing up his PhD thesis in biological oceanography at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. But he feels he hasn’t done what he wants to do in life.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Igor Zolnerkevic</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Igor Zolnerkevic - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science writing and the false idea of "balance".</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bryan Wetterow - "The New York Times science section is all about evolution today.":http://www.nytimes.com/pages/science/ (registration may be required, but its free, and they don't spam your email) "This article is of interest to me, not because I agree with anything it says, but]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kendall Powell</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Kendall Powell - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ever considered becoming a science journalist?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matt Brown - "Don't go into science journalism! Become a hedge fund manager instead!" advises "Roger Highfield":http://www.rogerhighfield.com/, science editor at "The Daily Telegraph":http://www.telegraph.co.uk/. "A friend working for a fund bought himself a private jet," he laments. Until recently, Highfield's news desk also sat]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nicole Jardine</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nicole Jardine - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
