<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - researcherid</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for researcherid</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>h+1</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Raf Aerts - Engqvist and Frommen ("DOI":http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.009) conclude in their recent article in -Frontiers- TREE that it is difficult to manipulate your own _h-index_ through self-citations. According to Thomson Scientific, my _h-index_ is -not worth mentioning in a Nature Network blog- 3. Could]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ResearcherID now with Mashups</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Martin Fenner - A real Web 2.0 application needs a serious "mashup":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mashup_(web_application_hybrid). At least the folks at ResearcherID thought so. You might "remember":http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/mfenner/2008/01/21/thomson-scientific-launches-researcherid-to-uniquely-identify-authors that ResearcherID creates a unique author ID for each interested scientist and was launched by Thomson Scientific (recently renamed to]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An easy online list of all your publications</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Martin Fenner - There are many reasons to list all your publications online. Maybe you are looking for a new job or want to attract students to start their PhD in your lab. Usually you find this information on the home page of]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are names important?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Martin Fenner - A Nature News article last week talked about the confusion that happens if a number of authors have the same or similar names ("Scientific publishing: Identity crisis":http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080213/full/451766a.html). This is apparently a special issue in China because of the difficulties transliterating]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thomson Scientific launches ResearcherID to uniquely identify authors</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Martin Fenner - Thomson Scientific last week "announced":http://scientific.thomson.com/press/2008/8429910/ *ResearcherID*. ResearcherID tries to solve a problem that has annoyed me for many years. In contrast to papers and journals, authors are not associated with a unique ID in databases such as PubMed. You are]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
