<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - peer</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for peer</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Becoming a publication reviewer</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ravi K - I am currently a postdoctoral researcher. For young researchers and professors, sometimes reviewing journal publications is regarded as an accomplishment in itself. So I would like to know how one becomes a reviewer in one of the nature journals. Is]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reducing the cost of facilitating peer review</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Graham Steel - Martijn J. Schuemie and Jan A. Kors, "Jane: Suggesting Journals, Finding Experts":http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/btn006v1, Bioinformatics, January 28, 2008. Abstract: With an exponentially growing number of articles being published every year, scientists can use some help in determining which journal is most appropriate]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The role of Journal Club in lab life and how to move it to the web</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Attila Csordas - Regular (daily, weekly) "Journal Clubs":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_club are crucially important events in the life of labs. By reviewing other labs’ results it is a way to get synchronized with all the data accumulated by a particular subdiscipline. Moreover it is the most]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WikiScipedia?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[John Dennehy - Richard Grant opines, *"So what about a peer-reviewed WikiScipedia? Jenny suggested that contributors should have “a PhD from an accredited university and a current and credible scientific affiliation”. That would be a nightmare to organize, and does not get around]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
