<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - open science</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for open science</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Voices from the future of Science</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matt Brown - Hi everyone - Science Commons is going to be building a public aggregator and spotlighting some of the open science debates - and debaters. "Donna Wentworth":http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/wentworth/, our community blogger, has just issued a call for links and suggested people to]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BioWiki</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dan Bolser - The internet is currently undergoing a revolution in terms of user contributed content. Never before have communities been able to share, organize and create information so easily. This new 'Wiki-Web' is quickly being adopted by scientists and students as a]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cameron Neylon</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Cameron Neylon - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jason Morrison</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Jason Morrison - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Worst Results Ever!</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ricardo Vidal - My previous post was focused on bad protocols and how the information that results from experiments gone wrong or with funky results. Some discussion took place regarding how such information could be disseminated. It seems that reputable scientists always do]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jean-Claude Bradley</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Jean-Claude Bradley - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pawel Szczesny</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Pawel Szczesny - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neil Saunders</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Neil Saunders - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Any brilliant ideas for stimulating cultural change and encouraging more open science?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Corie Lok - Open science was a pretty big topic of conversation at SciFoo. As I wrote on my "blog":http://network.nature.com/boston/news/blog/U66E7CD1A/2007/08/09/scifoo-ponderings-how-to-break-the-mold-in-science, I think it’s going to take some pretty big cultural changes before open science becomes mainstream. What can individual scientists do to stimulate]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scifoo ponderings: how to break the mold in science</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Corie Lok - So I’m a bit late on the post-Scifoo blogging…I’ve only just gotten back from California. Overall, the thing that struck me the most at Scifoo was how conservative science and scientists are. I know, not a groundbreaking idea, but I]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
