<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - open access</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for open access</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>A new paradigm</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Richard Grant - In a move that is bound to put "Felix":http://www.felixthecat.com/ among the _"Columbidae":http://www.rspb.org.uk/wildlife/birdguide/name/w/woodpigeon/index.asp _ the _Journal of Cell Biology_ has come up with an interesting way of "licensing":http://www.jcb.org/misc/terms.shtml its content. Emma Hill and Mike Rossner take us on a "journey":http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/181/3/405 that]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When calls for papers go wrong</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Martin Fenner - Last week I received email invitations from three different journals to submit a research article. I should have felt flattered, but it is unclear why it is me that received invitations to the journals "Biomarker Insights":http://la-press.com/journal.php?journal_id=4, "Genomics Insights":http://la-press.com/journal.php?journal_id=103 and "International]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allan Sudlow</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Allan Sudlow - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cascades in peer-review</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Juan Carlos Lopez, Editor of _Nature Medicine_, came under some attack for his talk and Spoonful of Medicine blog post identifying open access publishing as one of several publishing models. He's therefore writing some additional posts on the topic at]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preprint: The Control Fallacy</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[john wilbanks - So, I have been spending my copious amounts of plane time lately writing. I've got a series of articles under draft, including one on datuments, one on the dangers of naively porting licensing concepts from code to data, and another]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>mary joan crowley</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[mary joan crowley - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nick Sheppard</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nick Sheppard - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chris Surridge</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Chris Surridge - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mikel Ega&#241;a Aranguren</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mikel Egaña Aranguren - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fact Checking</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Eva Amsen - I'm writing an assignment for a class I'm taking and two sentences in I said "This was before Open Access, and before Wikipedia." That's when I caught myself: Really? Is it really? Check it! And I spent the next 10]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
