<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - npg</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for npg</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Vote for Method of the Year 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - "Cross-posted at Nautilus":http://blogs.nature.com/nautilus/2008/09/method_of_the_year_2008_cast_y.html: When the _Nature Methods_ editors sat down last year to select a Method of the Year for 2007, it was with the firm intention of initiating a yearly tradition. This year, the editors are are asking for]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On Open Content - NPG's Timo Hannay discusses science content on the web and business models</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hilary Spencer - In a 10 minute interview, Timo Hannay, Publishing Director of Nature.com, discusses some of Nature Publishing Group's online projects including "Nature Precedings":http://precedings.nature.com and Nature Network. He discusses content licensing on Nature Precedings and Molecular Systems Biology, which both use Creative]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NPG staff blogging and editorializing about NPG </title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - NPG staff blogging and editorializing about NPG From: Philip Campbell NPG takes a liberal view about its staff contributing to the blogosphere and writing editorials about publishing issues. This approach inevitably gets sensitive if colleagues choose to comment on, or]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NPG archiving policy -- 24 April 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - After speaking at a recent conference, _Nature Medicine_'s Editor "Juan Carlos Lopez writes on Spoonful of Medicine":http://blogs.nature.com/nm/spoonful/2008/04/15_seconds_of_fame.html, "It was fascinating to see how difficult it was for some people to understand that scientific publishing costs money, and that there are]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science Signaling Discussion</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matthew Day - Private NPG editorial discussion about possible implications of Science Signaling's decision to start publishing original research.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science by blogging -- 10 April 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Scientists know more than what they publish in peer-reviewed journals. And blogs can be a good medium for disseminating this tacit knowledge, says Gavin Schmidt of the NASA Goddard Institute of Space Studies at Columbia University, New York, in a]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Confidentiality of peer-review -- 3 April 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Sighs of relief were heard from editors after a court ruling denying Pfizer access to confidential peer-review documents from the _New England Journal of Medicine_ ("see _Nature_ *452*, 6–7; 2008":http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080305/full/452006a.html). On _Nature Medicine_'s blog Spoonful of medicine, "Juan-Carlos Lopez expresses]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In the Field -- 27 March 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - There is never a dull moment on "In the Field":http://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/, _Nature_ reporters' blog for scientific conferences and events. "Rachel Courtland recently blogged from the American Physical Society conference in New Orleans":http://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/conference_reports/american_physical_society/ on a Town Hall talk on ultra-high pressures: "The]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Retractions and corrections -- 20 March 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - The recent retraction by Nobel laureate Linda Buck and colleagues of a 2001 _Nature_ paper sparked discussions on NPG blogs. On "Action Potential, the _Nature Neuroscience_ blog":http://blogs.nature.com/nn/actionpotential/2008/03/retraction_reaction.html, Debra Speert calls it "the highest profile retraction that I can recall in]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NPG needs an Editor for the Protein Structure Initiative knowledge base</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Nature Publishing Group is looking for a dynamic, organized and creative science graduate with a background in structural biology to launch and maintain the forthcoming Protein Structure Initiative (PSI) knowledge base -- probably to be based in New York. For]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
