<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - nobel prizes</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for nobel prizes</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Nobel blogosphere buzz and who predicted rightly (and wrongly)</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Corie Lok - From my quick scan of the science blogosphere, it looks to me that so far, the winners of the Nobel prizes in the 3 science categories have been relatively non-controversial (unlike last year). (The winners, in case you’ve been living]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nobel season</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[John Bothwell - It’s that time of year…next week the winners of the "Nobel prizes":http://nobelprize.org/nobelfoundation/press/2006/press-prize06.html will be announced next Monday (Physiology/Medicine), Tuesday (Physics) and Wednesday (Chemistry). Boston has had a pretty good showing recently, with Harvard’s Roy Glauber (Physics, 2005), MIT’s Frank Wilczek]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
