<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - nature neuroscience</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for nature neuroscience</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Manners in the blogosphere -- 24 July 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Blogosphere etiquette comes into question. "We seem to be at a critical juncture concerning the intersection of blogs and other Web 2.0 technologies with science," writes associate editor Noah Gray at "Action Potential, the _Nature Neuroscience_ blog":http://blogs.nature.com/nn/actionpotential/2008/07/getting_out_character.html. The anonymity of]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Downloads as publication metric -- 26 June 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - The citations-versus-downloads conversation continues. _Nature Neuroscience_'s editors have analysed the number of downloads a paper receives immediately after its appearance online, and find a high correlation with its citation frequency years after publication. Associate editor Noah Gray provides the details]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are downloads an indicator of influence?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - The "June editorial":http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v11/n6/full/nn0608-619.html in _Nature Neuroscience_ discusses the relationship between web traffic and citations. The journal's preliminary analysis indicates that the number of downloads a paper receives immediately following its appearance online correlates very well with its citation frequency years]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neuroscience</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Noah Gray - A group for all neuroscientists. We'll be providing good discussion on what's new in research and publishing, neurotechnique trouble-shooting, interpretation of YOUR data, and more. Feel free to contact the administrators with ideas and feedback. If you are interested, I]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Manuscript transfer between journals -- 13 December 2007</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - The Neuroscience Peer-Review Consortium is an imaginative alliance of neuroscience journals. From 1 January 2008, if a manuscript is not accepted by one journal in the consortium, the authors can submit it to a second consortium journal and have the]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
