<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - investigation</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for investigation</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Why Cardiff Castle is bad for science</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brian Clegg - I've just come back from a couple of days in sunny Cardiff (well, it was sunny part of the time), which I've never visited before in tourist mode. At risk of being Ann Robinson'd +, Cardiff city centre isn't the]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Policing international misconduct</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[sara abdulla - In a "Commentary":http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v452/n7188/full/452686a.html in this week's Nature, Christine Boesz and Nigel Lloyd of the OECD argue for a practical framework for examining misconduct allegations in multinational scientific teams: it is imperative, they argue, for researchers in cross-boarder collaborations to be]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What do people want from e-science?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Craig Rowell - I think that we are at a sufficient interest level from both scientists and "lay-persons" to investigate this question. In all likelyhood there are several divergent wishes, but also some common elements. We certainly have the proliferation of resources for]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
