<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - est</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for est</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Another call for ebooks</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nick Wigginton - !http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2165/2139831945_2a99097f88.jpg?v=0! The debate on the switch from the printed page to electronic 'ebook' form has been brewing on Nature Network for a while (see "here":http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/UE19877E8/2008/01/09/in-which-i-consider-surrendering-the-printed-page, "here":http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/brianclegg/2007/09/26/two-cheers-for-ebooks, and "here":http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/henrygee/2007/11/25/they-shall-call-me-spinebreaker), but there is factor that has yet to be addressed: the environmental]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 'nano' balancing act</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nick Wigginton - !http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1182/1413111580_ce5d6fb232.jpg?v=0! We use 'nano' stuff in everything these days (as I've discussed earlier "here":http://tinyurl.com/6653ry). However, we still really don't know what happens when this stuff eventually gets into our water, soil, and air. One very simple example published recently in]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
