<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - creative commons</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for creative commons</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Big News (Warning: Legal Content)</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matt Brown - Larry Lessig "posts wonderful news":http://lessig.org/blog/2008/08/huge_and_important_news_free_l.html In his own words: *I am very proud to report today that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (THE "IP" court in the US) has upheld a free (ok, they call them "open]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mikel Ega&#241;a Aranguren</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mikel Egaña Aranguren - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My first paper published under Creative Commons!</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Paolo Massa - Cross-posted from "my blog at gnuband.org":http://gnuband.org "!http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2382/2337389244_6647778555_o.png(Page-reRank: Using Trust to Re-Rank Authority)! (Page-reRank: Using Trust to Re-Rank Authority by phauly, on Flickr)":http://www.flickr.com/photos/phauly/2337389244/ Time ago I received the request to republish one of my paper in the book ""Internet Search Engines]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SciVee License is Ambiguous</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[T. Troy McConaghy - !http://www.scivee.tv/sites/all/themes/scivee/images/scivee-logo-home.png! "SciVee":http://www.scivee.tv/ is a sort-of YouTube for scientific papers. People can upload videos related to publications from any journal. I was curious about the licensing issues, so I checked their "Terms of Use":http://www.scivee.tv/terms_of_use page. Right at the start, it says,]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clarification of Creative Commons licenses</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Andrew Perry - It's great to see lots of publications in Precedings being released under a Creative Commons license, however I've noticed some inconsistencies which I think should be rectified. On the "Document information" pages, the license information states _"This publication is licensed]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A move towards open access</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matt Brown - An MIT-based nonprofit group created last year to promote broader access to scientific publications, data, and materials yesterday released a set of short legal documents that it hopes researchers will sign and submit to publishers to secure their right to]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
