<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - consciousness</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for consciousness</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Samer Taleb</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Samer Taleb - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Properties of a conscious entity</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hans Ricke - Dear all, I just have split this off the "quest" thread: because it is one of the most interesting theoretical topics. What are the properties of a part, an entity within human beings, that enables consciousness? Can a network of]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Libet`s Conscious mental field ( CMF )</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hans Ricke - Libet, in an "article responding to Max Velmans":http://www.imprint.co.uk/pdf/Libet.pdf refered to his own research proposal. It would be great to know if anyone has followed this proposal starting from 1994. Did anyone succeed in testing the CMF? Libet states:"_The CMF would]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zhicheng Lin</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Zhicheng Lin - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Consciousness finally defined </title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Roxaane Research - Consciousness is not a physical or material quantity and hence cannot be defined. According to operational definition in Physics, “A physical quantity is said to be defined only when means of measuring it has been established.” In the case of]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Canonized" definitions of consciousness</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brent Allsop - People with different beliefs mean different things when they use a term like consciousness. Obviously the hard problem is real people, the pan psychic people, the spiritualists, and so on mean different things when they use a term like consciousness.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Might a general rule be a solution for the question of the correlation between neuronal processes and consciousness?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hans Ricke - In the „consciousness“-forum I´ve presented an idea which better might be discussed in this forum. But please be aware that it is really the presentation of an idea. My suggestion is that neuronal processes run rule-describing. I have proposed that]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The parlaris forum and a "Consciousness Cafe"</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hans Ricke - Since a while I am running a "forum":http://brain.parlaris.com with a much better software than the one here at network.nature.com I have called it an affiliate forum to Alfredo's forum here from the beginning and so far there is only one]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Consciousness Cafe</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hans Ricke - This group should give the opportunity to network in a more relaxed atmosphere. The participants should have a distinct interest in the *study of consciousness*, that is why it is not a public group. Nothing serious though. The background is]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Survey About the Meaning of Consciousness</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Alfredo Pereira Jr - Dear All: The success of Hans Ricke's effort to discuss the definition of 'consciousness' offers an opportunity to appreciate similar efforts, make comparisons and look for a synthesis. Chris Nunn (one of the Editors of the Journal of Consciousness Studies,]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
