<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - climate change</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for climate change</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Carbon mitigation, habitat restoration and conservation of diversity</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Kate Longhurst - Many terrestrial and marine ecosystems, which are being eroded by human activities, are central to climate regulation and the damage is exacerbated by positive feedback from the changing climate. Along with the resultant loss of habitat and changing environmental conditions,]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Climate Change and the Future of California's Wildflowers</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matt Brown - California is burning. The smoke obscures my view of Lake Tahoe from our cabin on the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. I can also no longer see the distinctive snow cross on the flank of the 10,000-foot peak]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Lewis</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[David Lewis - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Britain's Neanderthals</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Matt Brown - were "more perspicacious than usually caricatured":http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080623102544.htm. Meanwhile many of our modern H. sapiens appear to be heading in quite the opposite intellectual direction: "most Britons doubt cause of climate change":http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jun/22/climatechange.carbonemissions _"The majority of the British public is still not convinced]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mercury Rising: Health warnings for a hot planet</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[James Franklin - Daily news bulletins threaten devastation from climate change, with dire consequences for health. Just how inconvenient is the truth about global warming? Is this the most pressing health problem facing humanity, or are there more important things to worry about?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Systems Biology and the End of The World</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bronwen Dekker - On Thursday and Friday last week I had the privelage of attending "Biological Complexity: From Molecules to Systems":http://www.weizmann.org.uk/?node=13&id=10. There were many very interesting talks from members of the "Weizmann Institute":http://www.weizmann.ac.il/ as well as by researchers at "UCL":http://www.ucl.ac.uk/research/departments/ and other UK]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> LSESU Apologetics Society public lecture: Veritas Forum at LSE 2008 - "Science: Are we machines?"</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Li Kim Lee - My response was to acknowledge this, saying that such disadvantages could only happen under the current regime in which people have accepted that a line exists between Home and Work, when it is my contention that not only is there]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upcoming Summit in Cambridge: "Entrepreneurship for a Zero Carbon Society"</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Li Kim Lee - A friend just mentioned this upcoming event which might be of interest to group members i.e. the 1st International Summit on Policy, Technology and Investment: "Entrepreneurship for a Zero Carbon Society":http://www.cambridgeclimate.com/. It takes place in Cambridge University 22-24 September and]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bishop goes mad in Stafford</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brian Clegg - I sometimes think Anglican bishops should not be allowed out without a minder - especially when speaking on scientific matters. The Right Reverend Gordon Mursell, Bishop of Stafford, has apparently said that people who fail to act on climate change]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bush good for the environment?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nick Wigginton - !http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2131/2215195113_aa67be2a3d.jpg?v=0! A "NN'er":http://network.nature.com/profile/callie suggested to me yesterday that GWB might actually be good for the *environment*. Not for his science *funding* (even the *DOE* and *nanotechnology* programs received cuts), *conservation*, or influence over *EPA*, but because his foreign policies have]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
