<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Network - blogs</title>
    <description>The latest taggings for blogs</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/announcements</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Manners in the blogosphere -- 24 July 2008</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Blogosphere etiquette comes into question. "We seem to be at a critical juncture concerning the intersection of blogs and other Web 2.0 technologies with science," writes associate editor Noah Gray at "Action Potential, the _Nature Neuroscience_ blog":http://blogs.nature.com/nn/actionpotential/2008/07/getting_out_character.html. The anonymity of]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Carlos Alberto Viciano</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Carlos Alberto Viciano - ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science Blogging 2008: London</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Anna Kushnir - The official forum for Science Blogging 2008, to be held at the Royal Institution, London, August 30, 2008. The science blogging community is growing rapidly and reaching larger audiences. At Science Blogging 2008, science bloggers from around the world will]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Encephalon &amp; other blog carnivals</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ford Vox - Here's an archive of prior Encephalon issues: "encephalonarchive.com":http://www.encephalonarchive.com/ Do you participate in Encephalon? Are there any other science carnivals you participate in? Is there room for more neuroscience oriented blog carnivals, or is our attention already divided enough? Do you]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neuroscience Bloggers &amp; Writers</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ford Vox - A forum for the community of bloggers and writers dedicated to communicating the rapidly developing and increasingly important field of neuroscience.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NPG staff blogging and editorializing about NPG </title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - NPG staff blogging and editorializing about NPG From: Philip Campbell NPG takes a liberal view about its staff contributing to the blogosphere and writing editorials about publishing issues. This approach inevitably gets sensitive if colleagues choose to comment on, or]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Models and metrics to measure news blogs</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Via "Graham Steel":http://network.nature.com/profile/steelgraham, part of an abstract "New metrics for blog mining":http://vistology.com/papers/VistologySPIE07.pdf by Brian Ulciny _et al._ from a journal called _Vistology_: "In order to monitor blogging about important events, we must develop models and metrics that represent blogs correctly.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Web 2.0 in neuroscience</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Timo Hannay - This isn't new but might be of interest to people in the group. The ever excellent "Noah Gray":http://network.nature.com/profile/noah from _Nature Neuroscience_ has "written":http://blogs.nature.com/nn/actionpotential/2008/03/ng_neuroscience_and_web.html on their blog, Action Potential, about Web 2.0 in his domain. Together with the comments it stimulated,]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to enhance your blog: call for suggestions for our conference session</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maxine Clarke - Once you have decided to blog, what kind of blog do you choose? Blogging within a network, blogging on a stand-alone platform, group blogging, or microblogging, all have advantages and disadvantages. However you blog, it is all about communication and]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scientific Researchers and Web 2.0: Social Not Working?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sarah Kemmitt - So you use Nature Networks, but what do you really think of the impact of Web2.0 on research? Below we pose a few questions to get the discussion going. * _Social Not Working?_ Web 2.0 gives many opportunities for user]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
