• The Scientist by Richard Grant

    Raising being quoted out of context to an art form: 'awesome, but not always right'. Drinks well with scientists.

    • On things that go bang

      Saturday, 26 Sep 2009 - 21:28 UTC

      flowers

      It’s an indication of the length of my personal ‘to-do’ list that, though I managed to see and even review the new movie about Charles Darwin, I’ve only just got around to uploading my photos of the Thames Festival.

      jazz hands
      Jazz hands

      I had planned to wonder and pontificate on the wondrousness of fireworks, and how the heck you you get those beautiful shapes, and stuff like that.

      Butterfly
      Butterfly

      But I’m so tired right now that I think what I’m going to do is link to a site that tells you how to make fireworks,

      Here come the Vorlons
      Vorlons on approach

      and simply marvel at the prettiness of it all.

      I would like to know how they get some of those effects, though. I found a website that probably tells me—even me!—too much about pyrotechnics (although looking at the writing on that page, I do wonder if they think swine flu is a conspiracy).

      Instead, I’m just going to say ‘Oooh’ and ‘Aaah’. And point out that you don’t need a crap camera in an iPhone to get cool effects: sometimes it’s deliberate.

      Blackfriars

      Last updated: Saturday, 26 Sep 2009 - 21:28 UTC

      • Comments

        • Date:
          Saturday, 26 Sep 2009 - 21:40 UTC
          Jennifer Rohn said:

          Ooo. Lovely. I was there for the real thing and these are, somehow, much prettier!

        • Date:
          Saturday, 26 Sep 2009 - 21:57 UTC
          Eva Amsen said:

          [puts on philosophy hat] (Picture a mortarboard with two springs on it with butterflies on top that flap their wings, and in the middle of that a glass that is either half full or half empty. At the end of the tassel is one hand (clapping) and on the hand is a picture of a cave with silhouettes in it. Anyway.)

          In general, there are lots of things, not just fireworks, that you can just look at and enjoy, or totally overanalyse scientifically. Art, music, animals. Yes, baby animals are cute because their eyes are a certain size and we’re predisposed to blablablabla puppies. And music sounds good when the notes that are played simultaneously have a certain correlation, and you can do all kinds of math on it, OR you could just listen to it.

          Uhm. No, this isn’t going anywhere, really. I just wanted to show off my new hat.

          [twirls]

          [splashes]

          Oh. Guess that glass is entirely empty now. Or not full at all.

        • Date:
          Saturday, 26 Sep 2009 - 23:42 UTC
          Alyssa Gilbert said:

          I think it’s just fine to appreciate the beauty of things :) Sometimes science can ruin it.

        • Date:
          Sunday, 27 Sep 2009 - 07:34 UTC
          Jennifer Rohn said:

          Eva, I know a really good hangover cure if you need one.

        • Date:
          Sunday, 27 Sep 2009 - 09:05 UTC
          Anna Vilborg said:

          Really cool pictures! And impressive work on the “to-do-list”. To actually do anything with photos once taken is a major achievement in my book :)

        • Date:
          Sunday, 27 Sep 2009 - 09:47 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Thanks peeps :)

          I think Eva said what Alyssa did, just more drunkenly poetically.

        • Date:
          Sunday, 27 Sep 2009 - 14:26 UTC
          Eva Amsen said:

          Yes.

        • Date:
          Sunday, 27 Sep 2009 - 20:25 UTC
          Samantha Alsbury said:

          A doctor once told me that it’s regarded as a good sign of being a sane and well balanced person if you still feel wonderment and delight at things like fireworks…(thinking) can that really be true.

        • Date:
          Sunday, 27 Sep 2009 - 20:27 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          The state of the NHS, eh?

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 18:36 UTC
          Richard Wintle said:

          Somebody refill Eva’s glass.

          Those last two photos are especially nice. I particularly like the crispy-focus on St. Paul’s or whatever the domes are in the background, contrasted with the (apparently intentional) motion blur in the foreground. You’re definitely rocking that 450D.

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 18:57 UTC
          Eva Amsen said:

          You guys all realize that was water in that glass, right? (At least, that’s what I always picture in the “glass half-full” scenario)

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:03 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Right. Tell it to the judge.

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:06 UTC
          Eva Amsen said:

          And I didn’t even drink it! It was half-empty to begin with, and I lost the other half when I spun around to show off my hat.

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:07 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          OK then. I believe you weren’t drunk. Don’t know about those other coves though.

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:13 UTC
          Cath Ennis said:

          Half drunk?

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:13 UTC
          Eva Amsen said:

          Half sober.

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:13 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Half sober

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:15 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Snap!

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:17 UTC
          Eva Amsen said:

          I won!

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 29 Sep 2009 - 21:19 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          I said ‘snap’ first.


Search blogs

web feed Want a blog?

Submit this post to

Advertisement