• The Scientist by Richard Grant

    Raising being quoted out of context to an art form: 'awesome, but not always right'. Drinks well with scientists.

    • On blogging

      Tuesday, 19 May 2009 - 16:18 UTC

      Immodestly points southward.

      Last updated: Tuesday, 19 May 2009 - 16:18 UTC

      • Comments

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 19 May 2009 - 17:25 UTC
          steffi suhr said:

          Nice.

          But: apparently, there are asnoble reasons for communicating science to the public.

          Are asnoble reasons kind of like reasons that only pretend to be noble, but really are a bit half-assed? (or should that be half-ased?)

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 19 May 2009 - 18:36 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Editors. Eh.

        • Date:
          Tuesday, 19 May 2009 - 22:49 UTC
          Nathaniel Marshall said:

          (applause)

          Asnoble in the Asetralian. You are my hero.

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 00:45 UTC
          Katie - said:

          Re: the link. Congratulations! Apart from the strung-together words, it was a lovely piece.

          Re: the title of this post. Really? Was it supposed to sound mildly racy or have I been working in a male-dominated industry for too long?

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 05:43 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Thanks Katie, Nat. The paper copy does not have strungtogether words, asnoble, ignoble, or otherwise. And Katie, you’ve lost me completely.

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 07:04 UTC
          Nathaniel Marshall said:

          Maybe it would be ’racy if it had been phrased
          “Lab Love Rat the king of science blogs”

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 07:12 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Lab King the Love Rat of science blogs ?

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 13:13 UTC
          Eva Amsen said:

          I don’t know why I need to explain this, but Katie is obviously referring to the line “Immodestly points southward”.

          [giggle]

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 13:15 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Ah… that’s a value of ‘title’ I wasn’t aware of.

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 13:38 UTC
          Heather Etchevers said:

          I would have been surprised if the double entendre of the one and only sentence in this blog post was unintended. I could also see mistaking it for the title, especially if one was not acquainted with the “On this and that” series.

          Congrats on the plaudits!

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 13:42 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          It was unintended, although I don’t expect anyone to believe me now!

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 14:45 UTC
          Heather Etchevers said:

          Why deny it, if it’s true? ;-)

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 21:16 UTC
          Nathaniel Marshall said:

          Richard’s been in Australia too long. You have to point Northward here.

        • Date:
          Wednesday, 20 May 2009 - 22:58 UTC
          Sabbi Lall said:

          Congrats- that is a really nice piece.

          Editors. Eh Are so cool. [AUTHOR: Meaning as intended?]

        • Date:
          Thursday, 21 May 2009 - 05:44 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          STET

        • Date:
          Thursday, 21 May 2009 - 08:43 UTC
          J A Exton said:

          Hi there S.I.L. Now that you have forsaken the Land of the Long White Cloud for the Land of the Raised Pinkie, we are relieved to know that one Antipodean pastime i.e. bragging down South still stays with you. Loved the news article, Im basking in reflected glory.

        • Date:
          Friday, 22 May 2009 - 18:01 UTC
          Richard Wintle said:

          I liked “theeffort”, too. English really doesn’t have enough words in it with two doubled letters in a row. Now Welsh, there’s a language…

          I was interested in the comments about public outreach – we’re obliged to report on public outreach and engagement, as well as things like “social and economic benefits to society” and so forth, for a number of our large-scale funders. Obliged to report, I say, but I’ve not found any obligation to do it (other than the implication that if you’re supposed to report on it, you’re supposed to be doing it), and there don’t seem to be any obvious sanctions for not bothering.

          That said, I enjoy publicizing our science (as do the boss and some others around here), so it’s not onerous for me, anyway.

          [AUTHOR: over word limit, please reduce length of above comment by 90%]

        • Date:
          Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 00:07 UTC
          Cath Ennis said:

          And here’s me thinking Katie was referring to the tag…

        • Date:
          Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 06:55 UTC
          Richard Grant said:

          Stop it. You’re making me blush.


Search blogs

web feed Want a blog?

Submit this post to

Advertisement