
The fractal dimension of the percolation by invasion cluster at the percolation threshold is 91/48=1.89
Author: Alexis Monnerot-Dumaine; Source: Wikipedia.org
Since 7th this month I have become a PhD candidate, after graduated from Master in June (In China it is possible and prevailing one graduate from a Master and go on PhD under a different supervisor). My new project will be quite theoretically tuned which I am not familiar with at all. I have to make a plan for the initial literature review, which could be a project itself, by setting a logical framework of questions to answer.
The core key word of my project is physical gelation. Gelation is the process of gelling, from a sol to a gel. Eggs gel when heating for example. But in contrast to eggs, physical gelation is reversible. After randomly reading several papers of this field I can make the following statement:
Chemical (irreversible) gelation has been described with multiple models/theories from the classical Flory-Stockmayer to the most recent ones. All these theories in fact belong to percolation models differing in minor but decisive aspects, while a universal scaling relationship is observed in all these theories and therefore a fractal/self-similar structure in gelling is implied. Whereas the development of the gelation theories agree quite well now with experiments regarding chemical gelation, physcial (reversible) gelation, because of significantly different nature of crosslinking, is still questionable while these theories are applied.
This understanding of the current state of study is obvious not embodied enough to ask my own question. I need to answer, by reviewing papers and referring to books, the following questions:
The ‘What’ questions: What’s percolation? What’s fractal? What’s self-similarity? What’s the fractal structure in gel?
The ‘How’ questions: How many different percolation theories are there (major ones)? How these theories coincidentally come to a scaling law? How physical gel differ from chemical gel THEORETICALLY, so that it deviates from the prediction of current theories? How does the fractal structure grow when gelling, as predicted by a percolation theory? How different gelling mechanisms differ in geometric growth of fractal structural, so that agreements are met with different percolation theories?
One general questions: Can I observed the fractal structure by microscope?
To answer these questions I decide to start from experiment, as all science practice do. After reading a large number of experimental works I should be clear what phenomena are actually observed (maybe of several classes) and decide the most agreeing theories to learn in order to save time. By comparing the experimental results and the prediction of the theories in the literature I may find some problems existing in there. I guess problems may lie in the complex nature of physical crosslinking, which differs largely among different macromolecular systems. So I may design and synthesize a specific model macromolecule for experiment that can hopefully answer the currently unsolved question from a new and valuable aspect. Finally it will very interesting if I can figure out a method to directly watch the growth of fractal structure during gelling by microscope and compared with the pictures of those pure mathematical simulation, or in other words add another paint to the gallery of naturally occurring fractal, among many others such as ferns, mountains, cauliflower, and aveoli of the lungs. However this relies on comprehensive understanding of fractal geometry and is too early to say now.
Run percolation in you browser and watch the growth of fractal patterns
Hai,
Firstly i would like to apologise to all if this message is being interpreted as spam. Frankly, i have no business connection what soever with the owner of shaamtfractal.com (refer to as shaamtfractal). I would like to appeal to any person who knew the owner of the site to contact me personally or through this discussion group.
I have being following shaamtfractal since i stumbled upon it 3 weeks ago from a search engine. It seems that the fractal pattern is quite unique in the sense that it doesn’t match to any of the conventional formula known. I have failed to replicate it using any technique known (especially “Conflict Chamber 4”, “Turning Point 2” and most of it in the gallery). I am looking from the academic’s perspective and not from the artistic’s perspective because to me color & shade could easily be manipulated using a wide range of graphic tools.
Some of my academic collegue gave an opinion that the image could probably being produced from a high-end graphic software but they are amazed when i showed them the enlarge original’s image (7680 × 5760) because it exposed the very fine detail of the unique pattern not found in others fractal pattern. “Medussa Belt” clearly show a grow-like pattern.
I have tried in vain to get more details regarding the formula used from the site’s owner but the reply is that it is an industrial secret.
BTW, i am not trying to steal any formula from the site owner but just trying to get some clue regarding the formula & technique used to produce the said images and hoping that fractal theory could made a significant leap forward.
regards,
Fractal John Doe
-Fractal Math for civilisation advancement.