Does it have to be that way? Is science inherently sacrifice? I like to think that once it was, but is no longer.

Science, especially biomedical research, has always been viewed with a bit of reverence, with the idea that science is noble work being done for the benefit of humanity. Esoteric or not, every bit of research contributes to the knowledge we have of our world and our existence (right?) which is what makes it sound very loud and grandiose. Researchers are expected to suffer for their art, if you will.

As an example of suffering, I am in lab every day. Every. Single. Day. People with normal jobs are aghast at the idea. I am so used to my schedule (or lack thereof, really) that it no longer seems strange to me. Even so, I like to think that it is ok to consider research a job, one that you can dissociate from at the end of the day, and not a major life focus. Are people who feel this way, such as myself, somehow less motivated, less engaged than the researchers of twenty years ago?

The way I see it, the process of science has been greatly simplified over the last decade. We don’t have to purify our own restriction enzymes or test vaccines on ourselves or on young children. Certain sacrifices can now be avoided, but has the science been affected? Is whole-hearted devotion to the cause necessary for significant progress to be made? Although I have many more questions than answers, I know where I stand. Any input on the subject would be appreciated.

P.S. That mug is the best Secret Santa gift ever. I doubled up laughing when I opened the box. It’s so nice to have lab mates that know me well.