Brain, Machine and In-Between
Brendan Maher
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 18:05 UTC
In a commentary on brain implantable electronic devices, Jens Clausen of the University of Tuebingen explains some of the challenges that the melding of mind and machine create for medical and research practices. What are we to make of brain controlled prosthetic limbs that could restore, or even improve upon normal human functioning? Clausen says:
“These could be seen to challenge our notions of personhood and moral agency. And the question will certainly loom that if functions can be restored for those in need, is it right to use these technologies to enhance the abilities of healthy individuals? It is essential that devices are safe to use and pose few risks to the individual. But the ethical problems that these technologies pose are not vastly different from those presented by existing therapies such as antidepressants. Although the technologies and situations that brain–machine interfacing devices present might seem new and unfamiliar, most of the ethical questions raised pose few new challenges.”
Although parallels exist, do you think the challenges posed by such devices warrants special consideration?
Read the commentary here
And check out this week’s podcast for an interview with the author.
Updated 12 March 2009 15:25 UTC
-
Replies
-
I don’t see any problem.
Brain already controls everything.
Whether it is through natural interfaces such as nerve impulse and mental impulse, or through artificial interfaces – is largely a semantic argument to me.
-
I think a good idea, as well as for incurable diseases like multiple sclerosis and other catastrophic diseases.
-