I expect more neutrality from Nature blog forum.
B. B. Goel
Thursday, 13 August 2009 20:49 UTC
Why the posts in “Criteria of Evaluating a Candidate for Scientific Position” after 63 was deleted? Moderators can surely delete or hide inappropriate posts but if some relevant information was there and which is factually correct then why it was deleted? Is that because it was going against any specific member’s propaganda or image? That discussion was very important to understand how recruitment is done in reality in India. Such information is very hard to get in Indian context. It was a golden opportunity.
I do not expect that from “Nature”. I expect more impartiality from Nature blog and that’s why I joined this forum.
-
Replies
-
Anonymous
List of shortlisted candidates for recently held IIMTECH Scientist-E and Scientist-C recruitment.
List of selected candidates . -
Anonymous
This was expected from Nature as usual.
I suggested earlier to have a blog (like Chinese scientists) where you can expose scams in India sciences.
a). Reporting flawed recruitment process like the one recently happened in IMTECH
b). Reporting bad PIs
c). Reporting bad PhD students and Postdocs
d). Reporting data manipulation
e). Reporting favoritism in grants and other Indian scientific circlesand much more
-
