Science has multiplied because of the existing problems scattered around us. Basic science has command over the applied science if it is pioneering in nature. However the number of scientists drawn from this field are less and young generation has opted to branch out from these few original science. Thus the demand has diminished. But with the emergence of new technology, new ideas have come up to explain the basics behind such a technology and a new row of basic scientists are in demand now a days. To narrate a few such avennue we can talk of nanotechnology. Entire domain of science can converge to nanoscience. Nanoscience is not nanotechnology the way fractional distillation in a laboratory can’t be a petroleum refinery though it has potential to explain the problems of mega pot.Similarly cell biology is a potential area where a common platform can be set. One can think of biological waters present in the cells and their role. All waters present in the cells may not be biological in nature. Thus a problem – how to distinguish biological water from solvent water and how to set their rivalry or friendship inside the cells. This constitutes bionanoscience that can terminate with a solution for irking problems of years and there can’t be exaggeration if we say – this may lead to a new field of bio -nanotechnology. Two questions from this forum: 1. Are we ready to STEM out as leader in science? 2. Do we have potential to think beyond the existing basic science?
Regards