Morpholino oligos forum: topic

This is a public forum

2'-O-methyl phosphorothioates versus Morpholinos for DMD

Jon Moulton

Wednesday, 14 Jan 2009 18:21 UTC

Heemskerk HA, de Winter CL, de Kimpe SJ, van Kuik-Romeijn P, Heuvelmans N, Platenburg GJ, van Ommen GJ, van Deutekom JC, Aartsma-Rus A. In vivo comparison of 2’-O-methyl phosphorothioate and morpholino antisense oligonucleotides for Duchenne muscular dystrophy exon skipping. J Gene Med. 2009 Jan 12. [Epub ahead of print]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19140108

Now for some opinions, based on the paper’s abstract and my understanding of these oligo types (later note: reading the text has not dissuaded me from these views). I’m not surprised by the experimental outcome described in their abstract. In terms of efficacy and sequence specificity, 2’-O-methyl RNA is the best competitor for Morpholinos as pharmaceutical antisense. However, toxicity could be the deciding factor.

Phosphorothioate intersubunit linkages were introduced into nucleic acid oligos to slow their degradation. Natural nucleic acids have a phosphate intersubunit linkage which degrades rapidly in cells. Replacing the phosphate with a sulfur-substituted phosphorothioate makes the oligos resist degradation by nuclease enzymes. However, degradation still occurs, albeit more slowly, and the monomers that are released bear a free phosphorothioate group — and that group is toxic. This has been shown extensively in the literature describing the phosphorothioate antisense structural type – in particular, see the work of Cy Stein. Phosphorothioate groups are used primarily in two applications: antisense and pesticides (try a Google search of “phosphorothioate”).

The phosphorothioate linkage is used in 2’-O-methyl RNA oligos to resist degradation. Often just a few phosphorothioate linkages are used, producing a “chimeric” oligo with phosphate-linked subunits in the middle and a few phosphorothioate-linked subunits at the ends, a strategy that slows degradation from the ends while minimizing the toxins released by the eventual degradation of the oligos.

Morpholinos don’t degrade and they are far less toxic — the toxicity associated with Morpholinos comes from interactions of the oligo base sequence with RNA, a form of toxicity unavoidable with any kind of antisense. A well-chosen sequence can be administered at high doses without toxicity. In contrast, the toxicity of phosphorothioates is a combination of sequence-specific toxicity (like Morpholinos or any other antisense) and the chemical toxicity of the free phosphorothioate monomers.

Now I hope both camps and some independent groups quickly get on with comparative toxicity studies. If I am proven wrong, great — get a phosphorothioate exon skipper for DMD to market ASAP. An exon-skipping drug for DMD is desperately needed.

Updated 14 Jan 2009 22:32 UTC

  • Replies

    Post a reply
    • Here are some additional notes on: Heemskerk HA, de Winter CL, de Kimpe SJ, van Kuik-Romeijn P, Heuvelmans N, Platenburg GJ, van Ommen GJ, van Deutekom JC, Aartsma-Rus A. In vivo comparison of 2’-O-methyl phosphorothioate and morpholino antisense oligonucleotides for Duchenne muscular dystrophy exon skipping. J Gene Med. 2009 Jan 12. [Epub ahead of print]
      On reading the entire paper, I found that Morpholinos outperformed 2’-O-methyl phosphorothioate oligos in all tissues assayed. The paper reports levels of functional dystrophin in skeletal muscles higher after Morpholino treatment than after 2OMePS oligo treatment, 7-27% of wild type levels after Morpholino treatment compared to a maximum of about 2% of wild type levels after 2OMePS treatment. In the heart, Morpholinos produced over one-and-a-half times the exon-skipped transcript produced by 2OMePS oligos.

      We know that a 25-base Morpholino will tolerate a mispair or two and still have antisense activity. Heemskerk et al. show that for human dystrophin exon 45, binding of a 2OMePS oligo is eliminated by two mispairs located toward one end of the oligo (see their figure 1). Note that one of these mispairs can form a GT pair between the oligo and the human dystrophin RNA so this is nearly single-mispair discrimination by a 25-base 2OMePS oligo. In the future, specificity of the interactions of RNA with 2OMePS and Morpholinos should be compared with a range of target sequences to determine if this is a consistent advantage offered by 2OMePS oligos or is unique to the selected target on human dystrophin exon 45 in a mouse.

    Post a reply

Search forums Advanced search

web feed

Submit this topic to

Advertisement