<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Nasa's new lunar rover in action"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Nasa's new lunar rover in action"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/space/1267</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Daniel Cressey</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;That thing is huge. Surely a more compact design will be needed for whatever is being flown up to the Moon?&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;It does look very cool, but the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NASA&lt;/span&gt; press release for the Chariot is a bit downbeat about the prospect of it actually getting anywhere: &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8220;Some, all or none of these features may be selected for the design of a rover that eventually goes to the moon.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;It also notes that &amp;#8220;NASA&amp;#8217;s lunar architects currently envision pressurized rovers that would travel in pairs, with two astronauts in each rover.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;If you added a pressurized cab to this model of chariot and then shipped two them to the Moon you&amp;#8217;d be looking at a big load.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Nature blog from last year on moon rover:&lt;br /&gt;http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2007/09/pimp_my_moon_buggy.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:00:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/space/1267?page=1#reply-3306</link>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Cressey</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/space/1267?page=1#reply-3306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
