<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Site for science and philosophy"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Site for science and philosophy"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/454</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Brian Clegg</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Helen &amp;#8211; it&amp;#8217;s an attractive looking site! If you want constructive feedback for changes, I think the main thing it lacks is a clear sense of purpose. What is it for? What does it do for me as a potential reader? ... I&amp;#8217;m probably being too picky, but that&amp;#8217;s what struck me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:40:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/454?page=1#reply-1109</link>
      <dc:creator>Brian Clegg</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/454?page=1#reply-1109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
