<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Is professional blogging a lethal form of science writing?"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Is professional blogging a lethal form of science writing?"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Helen Jaques</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, something like &lt;a href="http://www.twhirl.org/"&gt;Twhirl&lt;/a&gt; would actually send me into total information overload!&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve stayed pretty clear of sites like this and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;, as, to be honest, I don&amp;#8217;t really want to read what my friends are up to every minute of the day.  I can just imagine how mine might read:&lt;br /&gt;09.39 Laments over adding too much milk to morning coffee&lt;br /&gt;09.41 Sips coffee and stares vacantly at pile of documents in it-tray&lt;br /&gt;09.43 Shifts gaze to staring vacantly at wall&amp;#8230;&lt;br /&gt;You get the idea &amp;#8211; it would be deathly boring!&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s less the &amp;#8216;noise&amp;#8217; I have a problem with, more the accumulation of interesting articles to read.  &lt;a href="http://www.newsgator.com/Individuals/NetNewsWire/Default.aspx"&gt;RSS readers&lt;/a&gt; have made it a lot easier to keep on top of it all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:52:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3895</link>
      <dc:creator>Helen Jaques</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3895</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Eva Amsen</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I know a few professional bloggers, but they were all &amp;#8220;for fun&amp;#8221; bloggers before and just turned their hobby into their job. But with all jobs there&amp;#8217;ll always be people who work &lt;strong&gt;way&lt;/strong&gt; too hard at it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:50:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3712</link>
      <dc:creator>Eva Amsen</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3712</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Henry Gee</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;@Martin &amp;#8211; how horrifying. Makes one hanker for the good old days of small pieces of paper carried around in cleft sticks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:56:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3705</link>
      <dc:creator>Henry Gee</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3705</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Maxine Clarke</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Fascinating, but scary, link, Martin. Explains rather well why I lasted one day on Twitter &amp;#8220;way back when&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:02:39 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3702</link>
      <dc:creator>Maxine Clarke</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3702</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Martin Fenner</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Helen, you will be happy to hear that &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/17/web-30-will-be-about-reducing-the-noise&#8212;and-twhirl-isnt-helping/"&gt;Web 3.0 will be about reducing the Noise&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:58:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3685</link>
      <dc:creator>Martin Fenner</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3685</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Maxine Clarke</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It was lethal for &lt;a href="http://www.bloggersblog.com/cgi-bin/bloggersblog.pl?bblog=418081"&gt;this Washington Post writer&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:50:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3684</link>
      <dc:creator>Maxine Clarke</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3684</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Helen Jaques</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Never mind blogging, what about even keeping up with reading the &amp;#8220;constant stream of news and comment&amp;#8221;?! I daily feel pangs of guilt at all the &amp;#8216;unread&amp;#8217; articles on my &lt;span class="caps"&gt;RSS&lt;/span&gt; reader and save more &lt;a href="http://www.connotea.org/user/hjaqu001"&gt;articles on Connotea&lt;/a&gt; than I ever have any hope of reading.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;We need recognition of &amp;#8220;web information exhaustion&amp;#8221;!  How about as a subclause to the proposed &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders"&gt;DSM-VI&lt;/a&gt; entry on &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/23/news.internet?gusrc=rss&amp;#38;feed=technology"&gt;internet addiction&lt;/a&gt;?!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:02:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3495</link>
      <dc:creator>Helen Jaques</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3495</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Kyrsten Jensen</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Heather Anderson actually turned &lt;a href="www.dooce.com"&gt;blogging into a full time job&lt;/a&gt; for herself, and now for her husband.  It all started when she blogged about her job, and then work found it.  Needless to say, when they read about themselves (like the guy in the office who feels the need to congratulate himself on every sale), she was &lt;a href="http://www.dooce.com/archives/daily/02_26_2002.html"&gt;fired&lt;/a&gt;.  She promptly got an interview on &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ABC&lt;/span&gt; news interview and a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Armstrong"&gt;wikipedia entry&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:23:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3478</link>
      <dc:creator>Kyrsten Jensen</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3478</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Cath Ennis</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Give me millions a year in advertising revenue and I&amp;#8217;ll willingly blog exactly what it&amp;#8217;s like to be so stressed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:41:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3472</link>
      <dc:creator>Cath Ennis</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3472</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Henry Gee</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You mean to say, people do this &lt;em&gt;for a living?&lt;/em&gt;. Oy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:58:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3462</link>
      <dc:creator>Henry Gee</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciencewriters/1318?page=1#reply-3462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
