<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Favourite representation of science/scientists on feature film?"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Favourite representation of science/scientists on feature film?"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Ben Cottam</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I saw The Andromeda Strain recently &amp;#8211; somehow makes microscopes very cool and slightly scary! Really interesting and exciting film though and lots of (reasonably) accurate science (it is about alien matter though&amp;#8230;). It&amp;#8217;s nice because the science is the focus and not just a side story.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Pi is a good shout too :-)&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Can&amp;#8217;t believe no-one mentioned Flubber! Ahem&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:27:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-6005</link>
      <dc:creator>Ben Cottam</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-6005</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Jennifer Rohn</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#8217;re making a rather lazy effort to keep track of films on the &lt;a href="http://www.lablit.com/article/12"&gt;Lab Lit List&lt;/a&gt;, but as novels are the main focus, we&amp;#8217;ve missed a few. Thanks for some new ideas &amp;#8211; and you can check out the List for a few others not mentioned here, keeping in mind that we don&amp;#8217;t track &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SF &lt;/span&gt;(ruling out Doc, alas).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:44:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3251</link>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Rohn</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3251</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Eva Amsen</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m rather partial to a particular scene: Robin Williams as Dr. Sayer in Awakenings (of course, based on Oliver Sacks&amp;#8217; book, so he&amp;#8217;s actually Sacks there) in the scene where he talks (quite excitedly) about years of research he did on worms, but in the end nothing worked&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Depressing, maybe, but it&amp;#8217;s kind of realistic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:58:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3248</link>
      <dc:creator>Eva Amsen</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3248</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Anshu Bhardwaj</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the recommending Dr. Strangelove and Brainstorm. I would like to list &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ek_Doctor_Ki_Maut"&gt;Ek Doctor Ki Maut&lt;/a&gt; meaning &amp;#8220;Death of a Doctor&amp;#8221; in the same series.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:56:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3236</link>
      <dc:creator>Anshu Bhardwaj</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3236</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Maxine Clarke</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;And talking of Pi, is this a sad story or what&amp;#8212;my (non-scientist) sister gave my (very much a) scientist husband a &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DVD&lt;/span&gt; of Pi for Christmas. Of course, said scientist is always far too busy working, modelling, writing papers, etc, to actually watch it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:05:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3215</link>
      <dc:creator>Maxine Clarke</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3215</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Maxine Clarke</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, and fewer &amp;#8220;essential bodily fluids&amp;#8221; ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:03:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3214</link>
      <dc:creator>Maxine Clarke</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3214</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Maxine Clarke</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I too love Strangelove but I think Doc gives him a run for his money. Not as bleakly, but faster-paced.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:02:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3213</link>
      <dc:creator>Maxine Clarke</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3213</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Steven Ericsson-Zenith</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely Dr. Strangelove.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:51:21 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3207</link>
      <dc:creator>Steven Ericsson-Zenith</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3207</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Betsy Pfister</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I vote for Dr. Strangelove!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:43:21 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3164</link>
      <dc:creator>Betsy Pfister</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3164</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Lee Turnpenny</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&#8217;re talking &lt;em&gt;science&lt;/em&gt;, then, being a Kubrick nut, I&#8217;d venture &lt;em&gt;2001: A Space Odyssey&lt;/em&gt;. Don&#8217;t know if that qualifies as a &#8216;representation&#8217;, but it is a great work of art, period.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;As for &lt;em&gt;scientists&lt;/em&gt;, that&#8217;s difficult, as they are often cardboard caricatures. However, I remember (although I haven&#8217;t seen it in years, so might revise my opinion if I saw it now) a film called &lt;em&gt;Brainstorm&lt;/em&gt; (1983), which was, sadly, the last we saw of the radiant Natalie Wood. But, aside from her and the always excellent Christopher Walken, I remember being impressed by the dishevelled, chain-smoking, unhealthy scientist portrayed by Louise Fletcher (best known for her cruel Nurse Ratched in &lt;em&gt;One Flew Over the Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest&lt;/em&gt;). Not what you&#8217;d expect, which perhaps makes it more interesting. Oh, and &lt;em&gt;Brainstorm&lt;/em&gt; was directed by Douglas Trumbull, who worked with Kubrick on &lt;em&gt;2001&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:13:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3161</link>
      <dc:creator>Lee Turnpenny</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3161</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Scott Keir</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Pi is really good, in a sort-of, not terribly complementary but quite &amp;#8220;accurate&amp;#8221; of sorts way. The next screening I know of is in &lt;a href="http://www.icms.org.uk/activities/mathsmovies"&gt;Edinburgh&lt;/a&gt; at the end of this month.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:42:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3159</link>
      <dc:creator>Scott Keir</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3159</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Martin Fenner</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s funny, just this weekend I watched &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032413"&gt;Dr. Ehrlich&amp;#8217;s Magic Bullet&lt;/a&gt;. Excellent acting by Edward G. Robinson, and a fairly accurate depiction of an important part of the history of microbiology and immunology. The movie gets extra points for talking about syphilis in 1940 and for taking place in my hometown Berlin (Germany).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:36:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3154</link>
      <dc:creator>Martin Fenner</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3154</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Maxine Clarke</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have poor memory too, and I know I&amp;#8217;ve answered this one somewhere recently&amp;#8230;.wasn&amp;#8217;t it Scientific American or similar title, which ran a feature on the editors&amp;#8217; favourite scientists in the movies? They tried to keep sci-fi out of it but weren&amp;#8217;t entirely successful I recall.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Anyway, my favourite is probably Jodie Foster in Contact&amp;#8212;because she&amp;#8217;s a competent woman and because she&amp;#8217;s within the bounds of being a normal person&amp;#8212;which is so unusual for a portrayal of a scientist in a movie.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;However, I do have to admit a fondness for Doc in Back to the Future&amp;#8212;that constant enthusiasm in the face of dismal repeated failure! But, he was definitely in the &amp;#8220;mad scientist&amp;#8221; cliche, as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:16:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3151</link>
      <dc:creator>Maxine Clarke</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3151</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Brian Clegg</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have a terrible memory for films, unless I have seen them several times (sadly there aren&amp;#8217;t any scientists in Casablanca)... I vaguely seem to remember that Contact had some half decent scientist moments before getting tangled with the usual hokum.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:20:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3148</link>
      <dc:creator>Brian Clegg</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/sciart/1215?page=2#reply-3148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
