<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Clarification of Creative Commons licenses"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Clarification of Creative Commons licenses"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/precedings/290</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Hilary Spencer</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for pointing this out.  Since the site does use the 2.5 licensing terms, we&amp;#8217;ve made sure that this is now reflected across the site, in the both the text and html source.  Our apologies for any confusion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:41:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/precedings/290?page=1#reply-719</link>
      <dc:creator>Hilary Spencer</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/precedings/290?page=1#reply-719</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Timo Hannay</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Andrew.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s supposed to be the 2.5 licence, so the inconsistencies you spotted are cock-ups and we&amp;#8217;ll fix them.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;We haven&amp;#8217;t looked at the 3.0 licence yet (I assume it came into existence while we were working on Precedings), but we&amp;#8217;ll definitely check it out.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:53:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/precedings/290?page=1#reply-633</link>
      <dc:creator>Timo Hannay</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/precedings/290?page=1#reply-633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
