<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "JOURNAL CLUB : Getting a GRASP on synapse location"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "JOURNAL CLUB : Getting a GRASP on synapse location"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/neuroscience/1263</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Michael Lin</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Yet more tricks with &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GFP&lt;/span&gt;! What&amp;#8217;s technically interesting about this is that it uniquely requires the self-associating character of those particular superfolder &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GFP&lt;/span&gt; fragments characterized by Cabantous and Waldo in their 2005 Nature Biotech paper. That is, high signal here requires that reconstitution be fairly easy and not depend on the fragments being held together for a long time, because the authors want proximity alone rather than molecular association to be the trigger. In contrast, detection of protein-protein interactions by BiFC/split FP requires the use of FP fragments that won&amp;#8217;t coassociate, so superfolder &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GFP&lt;/span&gt; broken at 215 is inappropriate for that. I wonder if the enthalpy of the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GFP&lt;/span&gt; reconstitution is big enough for it to function as a cell-cell adhesion molecule?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:22:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/neuroscience/1263?page=1#reply-3343</link>
      <dc:creator>Michael Lin</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/neuroscience/1263?page=1#reply-3343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
