<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Comet assay"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Comet assay"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/natureprotocols/651</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Tim Ward</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jieru Lin&lt;br /&gt;The comet assay is an excellent assay to use to detect double strand breaks as well as single strand breaks and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DNA&lt;/span&gt; crosslinks. The neutral comet assay is the one most frequently used for measuring &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DSB&lt;/span&gt;&amp;#8217;s and lots of detail can be found in Nature protocols June 2006 &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DOI 0&lt;/span&gt;.1038/nprot.2006.5 This is an excellent article by P. L. Olive and J. P. Banath. Peggy Olive&amp;#8217;s group has many years experience of doing the neutral comet assay and a pub med of her papers should give you all the information you need. Another method of estimating &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DSB&lt;/span&gt; is to stain for gama  &lt;span class="caps"&gt;H2AX&lt;/span&gt; using &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IHC&lt;/span&gt; or flow cytometry. A nice paper copmparing the two has just appeared on line in Nucleic Acids Research, 2007, Vol. 35, No. 5 e36. A number of articles have been published comparing these tow methods.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Tim&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:22:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/natureprotocols/651?page=1#reply-1610</link>
      <dc:creator>Tim Ward</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/natureprotocols/651?page=1#reply-1610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
