<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "low molecular weight peptides and spin column purification"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "low molecular weight peptides and spin column purification"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/natureprotocols/1140</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from James Ghadiali</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s really helpful, thanks for the info&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:40:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/natureprotocols/1140?page=1#reply-3270</link>
      <dc:creator>James Ghadiali</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/natureprotocols/1140?page=1#reply-3270</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Chaitanya Saxena</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Depends on from what else you are trying to separate it?&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I routinely purify a peptide of (1900Da)with Sephadex G-25 spin column (made &lt;em&gt;in-house&lt;/em&gt;) Separation profile is like this&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;a) Impurities of very low molecular weight (400-600 Da) and I can totally get rid-off&lt;br /&gt;b) One of the impurities is around (~1100Da) and it always comes along with my (1900Da) product &lt;br /&gt;c) Peptide recovery efficiency about 60-80 % if I try to increase the recovery I start observing increase in (1100Da) impurity.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;With these observation I guess you can use Sephadex G-10 for your protocol.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Hope this help.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:12:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/natureprotocols/1140?page=1#reply-3054</link>
      <dc:creator>Chaitanya Saxena</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/natureprotocols/1140?page=1#reply-3054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
