<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Education: Are we training too many scientists?"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Education: Are we training too many scientists?"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Brendan Maher</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The group Tapping America&amp;#8217;s Potential released a progress report on their stated goals to double the number of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) graduates by 2015.  You can find it &lt;a href="http://www.tap2015.org/"&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;  In an &lt;a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SCIENCE_CAMPAIGN?SITE=AP&amp;#38;SECTION=HOME&amp;#38;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;#38;CTIME=2008-07-15-06-26-18"&gt;Associated Press story&lt;/a&gt; running today, Accenture &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CEO &lt;/span&gt;William Green called the notion that market forces would dictate &lt;span class="caps"&gt;STEM&lt;/span&gt; undergraduate enrollment without taxpayer-funded incentives, &amp;#8220;Nonsense.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:35:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440?page=1#reply-5658</link>
      <dc:creator>Brendan Maher</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440?page=1#reply-5658</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Stephen Landess</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It has been the policy of the National Science Foundation since 1990 to increase the number of foreign students at U.S. schools in order to lower the salaries of of university researchers.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#8220;Johnny can&amp;#8217;t do math&amp;#8217; argument being played by college administrators and high-tech industry lobbyists just carries this perverse logic to new heights.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;And now, by adminstration fiat, under &amp;#8216;emergency&amp;#8217; rules, we have Michael Chertoff extending the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;OPT&lt;/span&gt; period for foreign students on F-1 visas to 29 months, which is a de-facto increase in the H-1B visa&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Will the last American technologist please turn out the lights?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:50:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440?page=1#reply-3976</link>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Landess</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440?page=1#reply-3976</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Donna Conroy</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What we need to do is restore Equal Employment Opportunity to the H-1B visa-hiring program so that employers are required to seek local talent. Tech professionals now face want ads that call for &lt;a href="http://www.brightfuturejobs.com/more/index.cfm?Fuseaction=Want_Ads_Only_H&amp;#38;section=more_8094"&gt;H-1B&lt;/a&gt; only.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;We can do that by lobbying Congress to pass &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S1035&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;In a letter dated April 1, 2008 Senators Durbin and Grassley, who had introduced bipartisan legislation last year to prevent H-1B and L-1 Visa abuses, wrote to the top 25 recipients of H-1B visas in 2007 stating, &#8220;Most companies can explicitly &lt;a href="http://www.brightfuturejobs.com/more/index.cfm?Fuseaction=Not_Required_to&amp;#38;section=more_8094"&gt;discriminate&lt;/a&gt; against American workers by recruiting and hiring only H-1B visa holders. As the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has said: &amp;#8220;H-1B workers may be hired even when a qualified U.S. worker wants the job, and a U.S. worker can be displaced from the job in favor of a foreign worker.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Legal discrimination always creates an oversupply of qualified professionals, as Salzman and Lowell&amp;#8217;s report suggests.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:37:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440?page=1#reply-3954</link>
      <dc:creator>Donna Conroy</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440?page=1#reply-3954</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Tuomas Ter&#228;v&#228;</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The article suggests that good performance in school causes students to kill themselves. Or perhaps the causation is the other way around, who knows.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Apparently the claim was based on an extensive study of statistics and correlations which, among other things, tell that in Finland the number of suicides is far smaller than in, say, Alaska (18 vs. 23 per 100 000). Thus I&amp;#8217;m inclined to believe that Alaska must have the best educational system in the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;USA&lt;/span&gt; or perhaps in the whole world.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Alaska has also a two-times-higher murder rate than Finland, which makes things a bit confusing. Why does a world-class education in Alaska make people kill each other but not so much in Finland?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:19:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440?page=1#reply-3936</link>
      <dc:creator>Tuomas Ter&#228;v&#228;</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion/1440?page=1#reply-3936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
