<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Top issues"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Top issues"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/lifescienceinformatics/231</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Deepak Singh</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ll reply myself.  One of my biggest gripes with life science, especially molecular modeling is the sheer number of tools that tend to do the same thing, and the lack of emphasis on quantum leaps in methods that make many of the tools used truly predictive.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:58:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/lifescienceinformatics/231?page=1#reply-505</link>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Singh</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/lifescienceinformatics/231?page=1#reply-505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
