High Impact made by famous ones

universal research

Sunday, 07 Oct 2007 15:08 UTC

I was wondering how much weightage does editors of high impact journals give to papers containing names of established scientists compared to those that don’t have them in the initial screening before sending to peer review. After seeing some of the recent papers with same/similar data and conclusion ending up in journals with considerable differences in impact factor I get this feeling. So does famous and established scientists can coax the editors of big journals to send their papers for peer review compared from those of less famous ones?


Search forums Advanced search

Submit this topic to

web feed

Advertisement