<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent replies to "Error bars in experimental biology"</title>
    <description>Recent replies to "Error bars in experimental biology"</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from William Burns</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Martin, thanks for pointing me towards that paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:06:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-4269</link>
      <dc:creator>William Burns</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-4269</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Bob O'Hara</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Am I allowed to comment on inappropriate use of bar charts in the paper?  :-)&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Martin &amp;#8211; I think this sort of thing is very useful: I find well-drawn graphs easier to read.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Ha!  I like this too:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;blockquote&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;However, if n = 3 (the number beloved of joke tellers, Snark hunters (8), and experimental biologists),...&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:11:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-3998</link>
      <dc:creator>Bob O'Hara</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-3998</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Richard Grant</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ooh yes, we did this as a &amp;#8216;journal club&amp;#8217; in a lab meeting last year.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8216;Svery nice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:08:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-3994</link>
      <dc:creator>Richard Grant</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-3994</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Maxine Clarke</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think I can fairly say that Dr Vaux has been instrumental in &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8217;s error-bar vigilance! Error bars are even enshrined on our &amp;#8220;green checklist&amp;#8221;: no manuscript can progress from acceptance into production until all boxes are ticked.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:58:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-3989</link>
      <dc:creator>Maxine Clarke</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-3989</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply from Philipp Selenko</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;nice contribution Martin (as always!)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:06:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-3975</link>
      <dc:creator>Philipp Selenko</dc:creator>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/forums/goodpaper/1512?page=1#reply-3975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
