Nature Cell Biology has published two editorials about the peer-review process in its most recent two issues. (These editorials are both free-access and can be seen here and here.)
The second of these concerns “what makes a good referee’s report”. A scientist disagrees with some of the points made, and the editor, Bernd Pulverer, has replied, describing the various juggling acts that constitute the editor’s job.
If you are interested in reading this stimulating debate, please do so here, and let us know your views, either here or at Peer to Peer blog.