Cultured Meat; manufacturing of meat products through "tissue-engineering" technology.

Kurt Schmidinger

Saturday, 01 Mar 2008 11:43 UTC

„CULTURED MEAT“ ; MANUFACTURING OF MEAT PRODUCTS THROUGH “TISSUE-ENGINEERING” TECHNOLOGY.
In-Vitro meat is the manufacturing of meat products through “tissue-engineering” technology. Cultured meat (= in-vitro meat) could have financial, health, environmental, and animal welfare advantages over traditional meat. The idea: To produce animal meat, simply without using an animal. Starting cells are taken painlessly from live animals, they are put into a culture media where they start to proliferate and grow, independently from the animal. Theoretically, this process would be efficient enough to supply the global demand for meat. All this would happen without any genetic manipulation, i.e. without the need to interfere with the cells’ genetic sequences. 

Producing cultured meat for processed meat products, such as sausages, burgers and nuggets should be relatively simple, whereas cultured meat which should be more highly structured, such as for an in-vitro steak is considerably more of a challenge. A steak is made of muscle tissue which is threaded through with extremely long, fine capillaries which transport blood and nutrients directly to the cells. It is much more difficult to reproduce such a complex structure than it is to put together the small balls of cells which grow to larger balls of cells which in turn become in-vitro chicken nuggets.

The most important challenges to overcome in order to outperform animal derived meat in terms of taste and economics are:

Starter Cells: 
These can be taken painlessly from live animals via biopsy. The question is: Which type of cells should be used? Stem cells are cells which, in a manner of speaking, have not yet decided what they will become; muscle cells, bones cells or one of so many other kinds of cells? This is a disadvantage because very specific cells are needed for the production of in-vitro meat. However, the advantage of stem cells is that they proliferate rapidly. The alternative to using stem cells would be to use fully defined muscle cells that “know what they are” although the problem here is that they hardly multiply at all. A compromise is to use cells which are between the two extremes, in other words, cells that proliferate at an acceptable pace and that are at the same time sufficiently differentiated from other cell types, for example, myoblast cells.
Growth Medium / Culture Media: 
The aim is to find a medium in which the cells can grow that is cost effective and free from animal ingredients. Serum from calves, for example, cannot be used with cultured meat. Because cultured meat does not have the digestive organs that a live creature has, which convert nutrients to feed the cells, the medium must be able to supply the cells directly with what they need.
Material for an edible scaffold for the cells to attach themselves to: 
In order to produce three-dimensional in-vitro meat, it is necessary to have a scaffold. The ideal is an edible scaffold that would not need to be extracted from the end product. To simulate the stretching that muscle cells undergo as a living creature moves around it is highly desirable to develop a scaffold that could periodically shift its form thus “exercising” the cells. This could be achieved by using a stimuli-sensitive scaffold made of alginate, chitosan or collagen, from non-animal sources. The scaffold would then stretch periodically in response to small changes in temperature or pH levels. The cells could also attach themselves to a membrane or tiny beads which could be layered on top of each other and connected together.
Bioreactor: 
It is in the bioreactor that everything comes together; the cells, the culture medium and the scaffold. Through fluctuations in temperature an environment is created which can be likened to a fitness centre with movement training for the muscle cells. Cultured meat must consist of small and large fibres of muscle cells in addition to connective tissue which produces collagen and elastin as well as fat cells which are important for the taste of the end product.
Economically viable solutions for the above listed points have not yet been fully researched. We are still waiting for the big breakthrough.
We would like to briefly remark on the idea of food being natural: It is intended that cultured meat should replace industrialised intensive farming; this poses no threat or competition to farming organic vegetables, for example. Compared to the unnaturalness of industrial animal farming, cultured meat would be undoubtedly a progressive step in terms of health, animal welfare and ecology.

FOR INTERESTED SCIENTISTS: WHAT WE CAN ACHIEVE TOGETHER
see http://www.futurefood.org/biotechnology/index_en.php

  • Replies

    Post a reply
    • I’ve always found this a fascinating area, as it’s one of those areas posing a significant challenge to both science and society.

      Would people be more squeamish about eating meat from an ‘unnatural’ source?

      Would vegetarians be prepared to eat cultured meat, as no animal has suffered for its production?

      Would we be able to create entirely new meat blends by combining, say, chicken, beef and pork cells in one culture?

    • That’s quite a mouthful Kurt….

    • Hi Matt,

      you mention important questions. Well, people are already prepared to eat unnatural foods, even meat as it is produced nowadays in industrial units without natural light, made up by concrete and steel only are not natural at all. But the food-industry does not emphasize the production at all, on the contrary, advertising always features the consumer and his/her social environment, like family, friends, but never show the production.
      Cultured meat would have the problem, that from the beginnig the way it is produced is very much discussed and comes to the fore.
      The only way cultured meat might be able to enter the market is that – besides reasons of ecology, animal rights, world hunger – the benefits must be overwhelming: Taste, health, price, shelf-life/hygiene and marketing must work together. And it is open, if this will be possible, for example to produce cultured meat as cheaply as meat from industrial livestock.

      If vegetarians are going to eat such meat or not is not the most important issue, as they are not the target group of cultured meat. Let me say this, as I have been vegetarian myself for over 15 years, and I do not really long for meat at all ;-).

      Combinations: Yes, that could be the potential of cultured meat! To combine strange things like crocodile with kanagoo taste, or whatever, especially at the beginning, when technology might still be expensive, high priced specialities for so called gourmets might help to enter the market. If marketing is able to make cultured meat fashionable and trendy.

    • Ha, I never thought of that last point. Because no animals would be harmed you could even grow meat from the most endangered species and open up a whole new realm of cuisine.

    • For most people, the production of meat and the preparing/eating of meat are different things. The former is very much connected to the animal body, whereas the latter is less so.
      Growing meat in a dish disconnects the production from the animal body and might invoke sentiments akin to Joan Gussow’s ”As for butter versus margarine, I trust cows more than chemists”...

    • We seem to do an awful lot of thinking about how to feed all the mouths, and not enough thinking about how to keep people from making endless numbers of mouths. But I guess that’s an issue for another day.

      The idea of “meatri” doesn’t give me any more of an uncomfortable feeling than thinking about traditional meat production. If I think too hard about traditional meat production, I get somewhat turned off to eating meat. The key to marketing meatri is to get people not to think about it and have some other idea in the forefront of their minds (or perhaps their subconscious) when they buy/eat it. They have to believe it is somehow more beneficial to them than the alternative.

    • Hi Graham,Matt,Kurt,Betsy …..

      In-vitro meat ! though this is controversial to nature ,we are saving animals. Provided we have to concentrate much on the fate of metabolic reactions and pathways of this engineered meat within the digestive tract after consumption.

    Post a reply

Search forums Advanced search

Submit this topic to

web feed

Advertisement