• The Scientist

    Life and Times of a permanently bemused British postdoc in exile.

    • Money for nothing

      Thursday, 08 May 2008 - 01:56 GMT

      “and your chicks for free”.

      Big money. Big science . A good example of why we need to explain ourselves:

      “These scientists could trim $10 million if they would just cut out some of the purple and blue spheres,” said Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD), explaining that he understood the need for an abundance of reds and greens. “With all of those molecules and atoms going in every direction, the whole thing looks a bit unorganized, especially for science.”

      This guy’s ignorance is shocking:

      “Fifty billion dollars to buy atoms is too much,” Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL) said. “Frankly, I don’t understand why they don’t just gather up all the leftover atoms in their test tubes and Bunsen burners. I think the scientists should have to use those up before getting new ones.”

      (HT: Ian )

      Last updated: Thursday, 08 May 2008 - 01:56 GMT

      • Comments

        • Date:
          Thursday, 08 May 2008 - 05:31 GMT
          Bob O'Hara said:

          FWIW, Bartlett is red/green colour-blind.

        • Date:
          Thursday, 08 May 2008 - 07:09 GMT
          Richard Grant said:

          That explains it, then.

        • Date:
          Thursday, 08 May 2008 - 08:03 GMT
          Brian Clegg said:

          Hmm, I’m not totally convinced that The Onion’s science reporting is in quite the same class as Nature’s…

        • Date:
          Thursday, 08 May 2008 - 08:28 GMT
          Richard Grant said:

          Naw. It’s much better, for one.


Search blogs

web feed Want a blog?

Submit this post to

Advertisement