<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Leaving The Laboratory</title>
    <description>Nature Network blog posts from user 'Samuel Frankel'</description>
    <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Will Changes in Career Paths Maintain Inequity in Professorships?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>So I was reading an interesting post on <a href="http://themoderatevoice.com/society/women/19540/why-so-few-female-science-professors/">The Moderate Voice</a> called <em>Why So Few Female Science Professors?</em> that makes a number of points regarding gender inequities in professorships. The most interesting revolve around how pursuit of faculty positions is challenging and not extrinsically rewarding (i.e. money, timeline of career development) in general, for both women and men. As the post says, quoting another blog, &#8220;Why would anyone think science is a good job?&#8221;</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:10:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/05/11/will-changes-in-career-paths-maintain-inequity-in-professorships</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/05/11/will-changes-in-career-paths-maintain-inequity-in-professorships</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My Thesis Presentation at the Univ. of So. Maine, June 5th @ 11:00a.m</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Anyone going to be in Portland on June 5th? I&#8217;ll be presenting my thesis research on the effects of arsenic on the cytoskeletal structure of brain cells at 11:00a.m. on the Portland campus of the University of Southern Maine, in the auditorium of the Luther Bonney Building.</p>


	<p>My project has mainly involved photgraphing the ultrastructure of brain cells, so I can promise you lots of beautiful (if I do say so myself) photos of immunofluorescent staining, and easily understandeable results! It&#8217;s also going to be a very low-key fundraiser (i.e. we&#8217;ll pass the hat and anyone who wants to can toss in a few bucks) for the <a href="http://www.blacksmithinstitute.org/">Blacksmith Institute</a>, a group that works on pollution remediation in the developing world.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:36:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/05/08/my-thesis-presentation-at-the-univ-of-so-maine-june-5th-11-00a-m</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/05/08/my-thesis-presentation-at-the-univ-of-so-maine-june-5th-11-00a-m</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tools In Your Toolbox: Keeping Up With Science Policy News</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>One of the most basic obstacles to the engagement of scientists with questions of public policy is lack of effective tools. Advocacy, bringing your background and your voice to the public debate, does not happen in a vacuum. It requires personal effort, yes, but it also requires the establishment of tools and processes that make advocacy accessible to people who would <em>like</em> to act on their concerns, but must also maintain other responsibilities, whether they be running a research lab or raising a child. If we&#8217;re going to have a broader representation of people with science backgrounds in our public discussions, then we need to find ways to mediate their participation. Otherwise, as a community we&#8217;re going to be the equivalent of your cranky friend who&#8217;s always bitching about politics but never makes that leap to  action.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:10:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/04/26/tools-in-your-toolbox-keeping-up-with-science-policy-news</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/04/26/tools-in-your-toolbox-keeping-up-with-science-policy-news</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Next Step</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, it only took me a few weeks to take an unexpected absence from regular posting on this blog. However, I do have an excuse, and I think it&#8217;s a good one. A couple of weeks ago I accepted a formal invitation to join the Peace Corps&#8217; agroforestry and sustainable livelihoods program in Ghana. Although I have no way of guessing at what the real experience will involve, from a few thousand miles away (and a booklet full of bureaucratic language where everything has an acronym) it looks like what I was hoping for: an opportunity to work on food security, environmental issues, and day to day pragmatics abroad.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:19:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/04/17/the-next-step</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/04/17/the-next-step</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Praise of Small Conferences</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>When you&#8217;re in the midst of a scientific career, conferences are often your best opportunity to get out and meet other science-minded people, discuss your work, and get a feel for what your colleagues are doing. Often though, conference attendance becomes focused on a relatively narrow band of topics related to your field of study. That&#8217;s not to say, for example, that the annual <a href="http://www.sfn.org">Society for Neuroscience</a> meeting (30,000+ participants) doesn&#8217;t cover a million and one different ideas and projects, but clearly there is a definite focus. And that&#8217;s great, neuroscientists need to talk to other neuroscientists, but there&#8217;s a lot of value in stepping outside your field as well.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:25:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/31/in-praise-of-small-conferences</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/31/in-praise-of-small-conferences</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science, Technology and Diplomacy</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>When it comes to great public speaking to blog about, lately I&#8217;ve been spoiled for choice. But in terms of science, and in particular the engagement of scientists and engineers in the challenges facing our world, I can think of no better example than <a href="http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2008/0217fedoroff.shtml">Nina Federoff&#8217;s plenary lecture</a> at the American Association for the Advancement of Science 2008 meeting in Boston last month. From her opening statements:</p>


	<p><em>&#8221;I&#8217;ve heard some spectacular plenary lectures at <span class="caps">AAAS</span> meetings over the years. The ones that have stayed most vividly in my mind address the deteriorating state of our planet, and the huge inequalities between our way of life and those of the poor in the world&#8217;s poorest nations&#8230;These are lectures that stir the imagination and the indignation and the desire to do something, but for most of us the impulse passes. It passes because it isn&#8217;t really clear what any one of us can do, even with our marvelous scientific training and skills. The problems seem overwhelming, our lives are busy enough. In the end, we go back to business as usual. My objective here is to persuade you that it is enormously important that you as scientists, as members of this country&#8217;s extraordinary scientific community, stop going back to business as usual&#8230;&#8221;</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:13:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/19/science-technology-and-diplomacy</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/19/science-technology-and-diplomacy</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goodbye to Arthur C. Clarke</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>As you may have heard, Arthur C. Clarke has died at the age of 90 in his adopted home of Sri Lanka, and the web is full of eulogies today, a transient digital blossom of remembrances. It&#8217;s late, and exhaustion ensures that this won&#8217;t be as eloquent as it should be, but Clarke deserves a moment.</p>


	<p>I grew up on science fiction, on Asimov, Clarke, and similar authors, and although my interests have shifted more toward what can be done on this world, at this time, I keep a little bit of that childhood wonder in my heart. It&#8217;s been years since I&#8217;ve read one of Clarke&#8217;s stories, but I can still recall a speculative timeline of human history that was included in an &#8220;odds and ends&#8221; collection of his writing. The exact wording escapes me, but I&#8217;ve never forgotten, and will never forget, the idea, &#8220;Humanity colonizes the stars, real history begins&#8230;&#8221;</p>


	<p>Take a look at the sky in his memory.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:12:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/19/goodbye-to-arthur-c-clarke</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/19/goodbye-to-arthur-c-clarke</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Whither Science Debate 2008?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>So, although I definitely appreciate the <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v451/n7179/full/451605a.html">dissenting views</a> ,I&#8217;m totally on board as a supporter of Science Debate 2008. In case you haven&#8217;t heard, <span class="caps">SD2008</span> is the proposition that on April 18, 2008 at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia the remaining candidates for the U.S. Presidency field questions specifically relating to (quoting from the official invitation):</p>


	<p>&#8221;...such policy issues as: American economic competitiveness and support for scientific research; policy approaches to climate change; clean energy; the healthcare crisis; science education and technology in schools; scientific integrity; GM agriculture; transportation infrastructure; immigration; the genome; data privacy; intellectual property; pandemic diseases; the health of the oceans; water resources; stem cells; conservation and species loss; population; the space program, and others.&#8221;</p>


	<p>So far, no candidate has accepted the invitation, and my question is &#8220;Why not?&#8221;</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:06:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/15/whither-science-debate-2008</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/15/whither-science-debate-2008</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introductions All Around</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Hello to the Nature Network,</p>


	<p>I&#8217;d like to introduce myself, I&#8217;m a new blogger and community member here on the Nature Network, currently located in Portland, Maine (two hours north of Massachussets and a different world altogether). I joined a few weeks ago after seeing the Nature web page at the <span class="caps">AAAS</span> meeting in Boston, and found the content worthwhile enough to keep coming back. I love the new media, particularly the podcasts and blogging community, as well as the core of the Nature mission, reporting scientific discovery. As someone who reads a fair number of blogs, and who had started taking <a href="http://sefrankel.blogspot.com/">a few brief forays into that direction myself</a> , I jumped at the chance to host my own here.</p>


	<p>I am currently finishing a Biology M.S. degree at the University of Southern Maine, focusing on neurotoxicology. I am, to put it mildly, burned out on research for the time being. It&#8217;s been great, but I need to do something else for a while, and my attention has been consistently drawn toward projects that involve using science and technology for a more immediate redress of specific problems than laboratory research often allows. In addition to my graduate studies, I&#8217;ve been heavily involved in a science education fellowship program (the Maine ScienceCorps GK-12 program funded by <span class="caps">NSF</span>), as well as serving on the steering committee of the <a href="http://www.theleague.com/me">Portland League of Young Voters</a> , a progressive activist group.</p>


	<p>I&#8217;m hoping to write something that appeals both to participants in the Nature Network, particularly those interested in the role of science and technology outside the laboratory, as well as any others who might drop by. In the process, I&#8217;m hoping to improve my own rhetorical and writing skills, so ethically I should warn you that this is in some sense an experiment with your responses as the dependent variable.</p>


	<p>Thanks again, and I hope that you&#8217;ll return.</p>


	<p>-Sam</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:09:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/13/introductions-all-around</link>
      <guid>http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/sefrankel/2008/03/13/introductions-all-around</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Frankel</dc:creator>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
